Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

2 Nuclear Fuel Cycle Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute (NSTRI), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of two types of experiments, known as "long pulse" and "short pulse,"  experiments, on identifying models for Lithium-ion batteries. The focus is on improving the estimation of the state of charge (SoC) using an extended Kalman filter. The results consistently demonstrate that applying the extended Kalman filter to models identified through long pulse experiments outperforms those identified through short pulse experiments in estimating battery SoC and terminal voltage. The article delves into the reasons for this improvement from both circuit and electrochemical perspectives, providing insights into the obtained results. Thus, the study advocates for the preference of long pulse strategies to enhance the performance of Lithium-ion batteries, offering insights that contribute to the development of innovative and sustainable energy storage solutions.

Highlights

  • Long- and short-pulse effects on lithium-ion battery models are analyzed.
  • It is proved that long-pulse models enhance SoC and voltage accuracy using EKF.
  • Dual-cell model is used and computational efficiency and accuracy are optimized for real-time battery management.
  • Circuit and electrochemical factors enhancing long pulse models' SoC estimation performance are analyzed.
  • Further research on optimizing battery models with advanced techniques for diverse conditions is suggested.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Aminzadeh, M. T. Hagh, and H. Seyedi, “Journal of Applied Research in Electrical Engineering Reactive Power Coordination Between Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Battery for Microgrid Frequency Control,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2022.

[2]    K. Propp, D. J. Auger, A. Fotouhi, S. Longo, and V. Knap, “Kalman-variant estimators for state of charge in lithium-sulfur batteries,” J. Power Sources, vol. 343, pp. 254–267, 2017.

[3]    M. Jiao, D. Wang, and J. Qiu, “A GRU-RNN based momentum optimized algorithm for SOC estimation,” J. Power Sources, vol. 459, 2020.

[4]    D. Nissing and H. S. Birnale, “Core temperature observer design and model parameter uncertainty analysis for a lithium battery,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 12505–12510, 2020.

[5]    S. Rout and S. Das, “A robust modified adaptive extended Kalman filter for state- of-charge estimation of rechargeable battery under dynamic operating condition,” Electr. Eng., 2024.

[6]    K. S. R. Mawonou, A. Eddahech, D. Dumur, D. Beauvois, and E. Godoy, “Improved state of charge estimation for Li-ion batteries using fractional order extended Kalman filter,” J. Power Sources, vol. 435, no. March, p. 226710, 2019.

[7]    A. Pooladvand and D. A. Abolmasoumi, “Dynamic State Estimation of Micro-grids by Using Accelerated Particle Filters,” p. 99, 2020.

[8]    Z. Ren and C. Du, “State of Charge Estimation for Lithium-ion Batteries using Extreme Learning Machine and Extended Kalman Filter,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 24, pp. 197–202, 2022.

[9]    X. Jiang, B. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Xiang, and W. Li, “Modeling and state of charge estimation of Lithium-ion Battery using the autoregressive exogenous model,” 2020 IEEE 1st China Int. Youth Conf. Electr. Eng. CIYCEE 2020, pp. 1–7, 2020.

[10]  X. Li and S. Y. Choe, “State-of-charge (SOC) estimation based on a reduced order electrochemical thermal model and extended Kalman filter,” Proc. Am. Control Conf., pp. 1100–1105, 2013.

[11]  X. Hu, S. Li, and H. Peng, “A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries,” J. Power Sources, vol. 198, pp. 359–367, 2012.

[12]  M. Zhu, K. Qian, and X. Liu, “A three-time-scale dual extended Kalman filtering for parameter and state estimation of Li-ion battery,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng., vol. 238, no. 6, pp. 1352–1367, 2024.

[13]  J. Lv, B. Jiang, X. Wang, Y. Liu, and Y. Fu, “Estimation of the state of charge of lithium batteries based on adaptive unscented Kalman filter algorithm,” Electron., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1–22, 2020.

[14]  L. Rozaqi and E. Rijanto, “SOC estimation for Li-ion battery using optimum RLS method based on genetic algorithm,” Proc. 2016 8th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Electr. Eng. Empower. Technol. Better Futur. ICITEE 2016, 2017.

[15]  X. K. Chen and D. Sun, “Modeling and state of charge estimation of lithium-ion battery,” Adv. Manuf., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 202–211, 2015.

[16]  A. Kaleli and H. İ. Akolaş, “Recursive ARMAX-Based Global Battery SOC Estimation Model Design using Kalman Filter with Optimized Parameters by Radial Movement Optimization Method,” Electr. Power Components Syst., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1027–1039, Jul. 2023.

[17]  W. Bai, X. Zhang, Z. Gao, S. Xie, K. Peng, and Y. Chen, “Sensorless Coestimation of Temperature and State-of-Charge for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on a Coupled Electrothermal Model,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 2023, pp. 1–18, 2023.

[18]  T. Sun, R. Wu, Y. Cui, and Y. Zheng, “Sequent extended Kalman filter capacity estimation method for lithium-ion batteries based on discrete battery aging model and support vector machine,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 39, no. May, p. 102594, 2021.

[19]  X. Wei, M. Yimin, and Z. Feng, “Identification of Parameters in Li-Ion Battery Model by Least Squares Method with Variable Forgetting Factor,” Int. J. Comput. Methods, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1–20, 2020.

[20] J. Sun et al., “Online internal temperature estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on Kalman filter,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 4400–4415, 2015.